Blog | Are binding fiscal rules the right solution for debt sustainability in South Africa?

Blog | Are binding fiscal rules the right solution for debt sustainability in South Africa?

IEJ Webinar Series | 12 February 2025

The National Treasury has presented the proposal for a binding fiscal rule as one of the potential solutions to chart South Africa’s debt on a sustainable path. International evidence, however, suggests that it is not a panacea for addressing public debt concerns. It has political and social implications that may hinder its efficacy in the long run. 

The ANC’s Economic Transformation Committee has rejected a potential fiscal rule and pointed to the rigidity it imposes on fiscal policy. At the same time, the Minister of Finance cast doubt over its effectiveness/suitability. As the National Treasury prepares to hold stakeholder engagements on the proposal and publish its discussion document in March 2025, the IEJ invited key experts to share their insights on the proposal for a fiscal rule, and whether it can arrest South Africa’s debt concerns, along with potential alternatives. 

This engagement kickstarted the IEJ’s webinar series for 2025. The series will cover a range of topics, including social security, food systems, energy, the just transition, climate finance, and other issues related to the IEJ’s work. 

Facilitator: Joan Stott 
Presenters: Liso Mdutyana and Zimbali Mncube
Panelists: Michael Sachs, Krige Siebrits, and Seeraj Mohammed 

Addressing South Africa’s debt: Why a new fiscal rule is not the answer

The IEJ’s team began the webinar by presenting findings from their discussion paper. The presenters argued that South Africa’s debt-to-GDP ratio is not the main challenge to budget sustainability. Rather it is the high interest payments South Africa is paying on debt. The IEJ’s findings show that a fiscal rule limits the flexibility of fiscal policy in responding to external shocks, it leads to a non-transparent budget process to adhere to the numerical limits and may worsen budget cuts. They instead called for more direct ways to tackle debt concerns such as reducing the cost of debt and using fiscal policy to maximise growth. Liso Mdutyana cautioned that “fiscal rules cannot be a substitute for budgeting based on negotiation and consensus building with stakeholders” and that “If the National Treasury wants to achieve a more sustainable fiscal path it needs to build political convergence behind such.” 

Should we be concerned about fiscal sustainability?

Michael Sachs emphasised that fiscal sustainability is a problem that we should be concerned about, in general, in the abstract, and the concrete given South Africa’s current conditions.

A key question he posed was, “What is the political basis of fiscal sustainability?” He echoed sentiments by Blanchard, arguing that we should be speaking about fiscal standards rather than fiscal rules. These standards should be adjudicated by independent institutions and entail a move away from quantitative numerical limits to qualitative fiscal standards. In other words “a move away from the pure public finance view of debt sustainability” which the National Treasury is still using according to Michael Sachs.  It is no longer viable to delegate fiscal sustainability to the National Treasury, there is a need for a shift to a negotiated social compact type of discussion on fiscal policy.

A move towards fiscal standards?

Krige Seibrits’ presentation echoed some of the concerns highlighted by the IEJ discussion paper, noting that the adoption of fiscal rules is regularly breached, is complex, comes with political risks, and should not be overestimated to address fiscal problems. The latter is clear in the debt break debate in Germany. He highlighted that the German debt brake “once known as a key example to emulate ironically has now caused tensions regarding its constitutionality in the traffic light-coalition in Germany.”

In agreement with Michael Sachs, Krige Seibrits called for a move towards fiscal standards as opposed to attaching a numerical limit to fiscal sustainability. He argued that it should be considered as part of the extension of our current fiscal sustainability regime. The scope of the fiscal standards and who sets them is something that should be discussed further. 

Closure and way forward 

The webinar highlighted the shortcomings of fiscal rules and their impact on fiscal policy. Speakers reflected on the need to use fiscal policy to maximise growth, address South Africa’s structural unemployment, and take measures to reduce the cost of borrowing. Rather than a fiscal rule, the discussion noted that other countries have tended to adopt fiscal standards, and this opens up fiscal policy to more deliberation and engagement with a wide range of stakeholders. 

Going forward, the IEJ will continue to engage relevant political parties and the National Treasury on the proposal for a new fiscal rule and its implications for fiscal policy in the long run.